Garmin Colorado 300 review

UPDATE: I'm recommending the new touch-screen Garmin Oregon series instead of the Colorado. It has a superior interface, along with almost all the other good things found on the Colorado. Read my hands-on review of the Oregon 400t for more information. I've also posted a page on the comparable model in the Oregon line -- the Garmin Oregon 300.

The Garmin Colorado 300 is one of the first in a new line of handheld GPS receivers from Garmin. It has a completely new interface, very different from the eTrex and 60/76 series units. I've had mine for a couple of weeks now and have been enjoying getting to know it.

Before we get into the details of my hands on review, lets compare the major differences between the four Colorado models:

• 300 - Worldwide basemap with shaded relief, no pre-loaded detail maps
• 400t - Worldwide basemap with shaded relief, U.S. topo maps pre-loaded
• 400i - Worldwide basemap with satellite imagery, U.S. inland lakes and navigable rivers charts pre-loaded
• 400c - Worldwide basemap with satellite imagery, U.S. coastal waters and Bahamas charts pre-loaded

Compare prices on the Garmin Colorado 300

Since this is a landlubbers blog, I'll mostly ignore the marine units. So the key question is whether to buy the Colorado 300 or the 400t. The 300 is a great unit for those that already own Garmin's Topo U.S. 2008. Otherwise, you may want to buy the 400t, which comes with those maps pre-loaded. On to the details of the Garmin Colorado 300 review...

High-resolution screen and shaded relief

The Garmin Colorado series uses a large 3" (diagonal) screen with a 240 x 400 pixel resolution screen, allowing it to deliver some beautiful imagery. Unfortunately, the high res screen isn't as bright as previous handheld models. I don't think it's a deal killer, but it is something to be aware of.

The high-resolution screen, along with the DEM data embedded in Topo U.S. 2008, allows it to display gorgeous shaded relief maps (see image at right) and 3-D terrain. This allows much better visualization of the surrounding terrain, a great improvement for backcountry enthusiasts.

A new interface

The Garmin Colorado series has things in common with both previous Garmin handhelds and with their auto navigation line. This is an entirely new platform and interface that will require a little getting used to if you've ever used an older Garmin handheld.

Garmin has managed to greatly reduce the number of buttons on the unit. My 60CSx has ten buttons; my Colorado has four (including the power button). The big change that allowed this is the "rock n roller" button at the top of the unit.  It's three distinct types of motions are shown below (image courtesy of Garmin).

1. When pressed, the center acts as an Enter key.
2. You can move the cursor in four directions to select menu items, highlight the map, etc.
3. And then there is the outer wheel, which can be rotated to move through menus and zoom the map; I love that last feature!

Another big change to the interface is the context sensitive left and right soft key, pictured below (image courtesy of Garmin).

The shortcuts menu

Hit the right soft key in the image above and you get the shortcuts menu (shown at right), which you can spin through with the rock n' roller wheel. Here you have access to what were termed "pages" on the 60CSx. They include map, compass, elevation plot, setup,  trip computer, where to, add page, others and mark waypoint.

The latter function can also be accomplished by holding down the center of the rock n' roller. 

Items under "others" can be added to the shortcuts menu using "add page." These "other" items include share wirelessly, image viewer, 3D view, geocaches, Whereigo, sun and moon, hunt and fish, waypoint manager, route planner, active route, area calculation, alarm clock, calculator, stopwatch, calendar, profile change, recent finds and the satellite screen.

Garmin Colorado features

All the current Colorado units have an electronic compass and barometric altimeter. They also come with a picture viewer, an SD card slot, and a high-sensitivity chipset for superior reception in difficult conditions,

The Colorado has a number of interesting new features too:

• If you have a friend with a Colorado, you can wirelessly share basic waypoint, route and geocache data between units
• The Colorado can display data from an optional heart-rate monitor and/or speed and cadence sensor
• It also supports Whereigo activities, from the folks behind geocaching.com, speaking of which...

Geocaching

The Colorado series appears to be at least partially targeted towards geocachers, with an effort to make the Colorado a "paperless geocaching" tool. Unlike previous Garmin handhelds, the Colorado will accept and display the full description, cache size, difficulty and terrain ratings, and recent logs. I really like this feature, and it will probably get me out geocaching more. Geocaching mode screen shots follow.

A replacement for the 60CSx?

What is less clear is whether Garmin intends this to be a replacement for the 60CSx or not. The Colorado does not (at this time) have the full complement of features and options found on the 60CSx. The Colorado has inherited some nuvi-like features (e.g., USB mass storage mode). I hope it hasn't inherited the nuvi's lack of options and flexibility as well. Read on for more on this.

Deficiencies?

UPDATE: Garmin has released new firmware for the Colorado series, which improves or fixes some of the issues below. Here is a link to a discussion thread that leads off with the fix list.

A number of perceived deficiencies in the Colorado series have been documented by forum participants at Groundspeak, which has been compiled into a Garmin Colorado issues list. I won't go into all of them here, but the worse, IMHO, are the following:

• Won't show geocaches on map without a workaround
• Cannot mark a geocache as found
• Several key geocaching mode functions are missing -- there is no find nearest/next, nor can you select by symbol / type
• Backlight setting not stored when powering off
• No busy indicator during lengthy processes
• No single place to reset trip data
• No waypoint averaging
• North up / track up option not available from the map page (you must go to Setup>Map)
• Cannot change track color
• Cannot display multiple saved tracks
• NiMH battery reserve not properly reported, so the unit automatically dims the backlight even though significant NiMH power reserves remain
• Cannot pan the map and then search from that point of reference
• Can't zoom in below 80 feet on the map

Continuing improvements

Having listed those issues, I must add that Garmin has a reputation for frequent firmware updates and has demonstrated a continuing commitment to improving their products following release to the public. You can verify this by going to the download page for any Garmin product and looking at the change history. Garmin has already released one firmware update for the Colorado series and I'm sure more will be forthcoming.

Recommendation

I'm giving the Colorado series a qualified recommendation, keeping in mind the screen brightness and the fact that some firmware issues remain to be addressed.

For geocachers, if you can bear with Garmin while they improve the unit, I think it is a real winner. The paperless geocaching feature is a huge improvement.

UPDATE: I've decided against recommending the Colorado for backcountry navigation (hiking, mountain biking, etc.) for the time being, due to some navigation deficiencies in the unit.

More Garmin Colorado 300 reviews

• Consumers are posting their own Garmin Colorado 300 reviews at GPSNow
• And there are more consumer-written Garmin Colorado 300 reviews at Amazon
• GpsPasSion has started a thread of user-generated Garmin Colorado 300 reviews
• Here is a review comparing the Garmin Colorado 300 with the older Garmin 60CS
• Mobile Arsenal reviews the Garmin Colorado 300
• Trailspace.com posts a brief review of the Colorado 300, giving it only 2-1/2 out of 5 stars
• OutdoorsMagic.com gives a UK perspective in their Garmin Colorado 300 review
• This Garmin Colorado 300 review looks at it as a companion for a metal detector
• LetsGoMobile has also posted a Garmin Colorado 300 review
• Mapomatic reviews the Colorado 300, comparing it to the Garmin 60CSx
• LiveForTheOutdoors has posted a video review of the Colorado 300:

Other Garmin Colorado 300 resources

• The Garmin Colorado 300 owners manual in the language of your choice
• GPS Fix is a blog that focuses on the Garmin Oregon and Colorado series
  
• A Garmin Colorado mini-site
• Compare the Garmin Colorado 300 to other Garmin handhelds
• Compare the Garmin Colorado and Oregon series
• Compare the Colorado to the Garmin 60CSx
• An FAQ by Garmin
• Another Garmin Colorado FAQ -- see GC16 for info on multiple geocaching views
• There is a Garmin Colorado message forum at Yahoo!
• And another Colorado forum

Compare prices on the Garmin Colorado 300 at these merchants:

• Find the low price on a Garmin Colorado 300 at GPS Now, where shipping is free on orders over $99 (and the upgrade to overnight shipping is dirt cheap!). Order by 5 p.m. Central Time for same day shipment.
• Check the current Garmin Colorado 300 price at Amazon.
• Buy the Garmin Colorado 300 GPS at REI.com, where satisfaction is guaranteed and members get 10% back on eligible purchases.
• Get the Garmin Colorado 300 Color Hand Held GPS Navigator at TigerGPS, where you get free shipping on orders above $250.
• Find the Garmin Colorado 300 for an amazing price on eBay.
• Check out our GPS deals site for current specials and rebates on a wide range of GPS receivers

From the official Garmin Colorado 300 web page:

Gear up and explore the backcountry with the all-terrain Colorado 300. Packed with features, it includes a built-in basemap, high-sensitivity receiver, barometric altimeter, electronic compass, SD card slot, color display, picture viewer and more. Even exchange tracks, waypoints, routes and geocaches wirelessly between similar units. When the going gets tough, Colorado leads the way.

Related posts:

• Garmin Colorado bike mount
• Our GPS reviews
• Handheld GPS buyers guide
• Top ten handheld GPS

Comments

[Leszek Pawlowicz]

One thing I've wondered about on the 400t is the resolution of the included topo maps. Do you know if they're the equivalent of the Topo 2008 maps (i.e. 150-ft. contours), or whether they're better/worse?

[Rich Owings]

Leszek,

They're the same as Topo 2008, which uses 1:100K USGS data. Maybe we'll get tighter contours in Topo 2009...

http://gpstracklog.typepad.com/gps_tracklog/2007/08/speculation---g.html

[Nomen Nescio]

I've only the manual at my disposal, but I imagine having noticed another Colorado flaw compared to the 60 series: proximity waypoints (and proximity alerts) seem missing.

Firmware upgrade: I have difficulties to recall a 60C upgrade adding any new feature. I agree with you that the Colorado is not a (straight) successor of the 60 series, but I have my doubts whether there will be one: with (among others) Nüviphone announced, Garmin seems to bet on the more profitable online map updates (as opposed the old Garmin-modell with once-a-year updated, static maps tied to a single unit).

[g.o.cashers]

A well written (and fair) review. Thanks for referencing the FAQ and Issues List.

Couple of notes:

Some of the FAQ links are broken because I reorganized the FAQ into multiple pages yesterday. Sorry, but it was getting hard to follow as one big page!

One other big issue that I'm surprised that didn't get mention but is probably also worse for 400t users:

- Startup performance is slow with the 400t full map set. It takes about 40 seconds to get to the first screen from power on. Garmin really needs to give 400t users the ability carve out pieces of the entire map (e.g. Mapsource) if startup time can't be improved.

- Geocaching performance. If you only have a few hundred caches loaded you won't notice this issue but if you load 1000-2000 caches, which isn't uncommon for serious cachers, you'll see a significant slowdown in both startup time and the time required to view geocaches.

-Scott (aka g-o-cashers and GO$Rs)

http://garmincolorado.wikispaces.com/

[Jake]

I can't live without topographic quad maps at 1:24000. Today's vector maps are still missing too much detail. Delorme has a much better offering.

[Leszek Pawlowicz]

Just started a short series on creating custom waypoints for the recent Garmin mapping GPS units:

http://freegeographytools.com/2008/creating-custom-waypoint-icons-for-garmin-gps-units-i

And was wondering, does the Colorado series support custom waypoints? Manual doesn't mention them.

[Rich Owings]

Leszek,

I assume you can (don't know for sure), but won't have a chance to check it out for awhile. Thanks for the nice comment on the Asheville post BTW.

[Vidar]

Do you have some tracklog comparisons with a Garmin 60CSx?

[Rich Owings]

Vidar,

Not yet, but anecdotal evidence suggests that it may be superior. I'm in the midst of a cross country move, but I hope to get my bike and be able to post a comparison within a couple of weeks.

[g.o.cashers]

The Colorado does not have support for custom waypoint symbols. Obviously many people are hoping it gets added as a feature in an upcoming release.

GO$Rs

[Ryan]

What is the antenna sensitivity like? How does it compare to the 60Cx with the SirfStar III chipset etc...?
Sorry if this was mentioned somewhere before.

[Rich Owings]

Thanks GO$RS.

[Rich Owings]

Ryan, sorry, I posted a bad link. Try this...
http://gpstracklog.typepad.com/gps_tracklog/2008/03/garmin-colora-2.html

[willyhoops]

I bought one and suffered water damage. The unit is much less water resistant than my old garmin GPS 60. I googled garmin water damage and see others are talking about it as well. it looks like the current generation does not resist water properly and its a pretty big flaw.
Otherwise i like the unit but found the software annoying- especially the inability to create a route by simply clicking on the map intead of saving waypoints first.
Needs some work this unit!

[Rich Owings]

Yeah, I'm starting to hear about some water damage reports. Thanks for letting me know.

[willyhoops]

I though I would post this picture on the net just to show how bad this is.

http://www.willyhoops.com/garmin_colorado_300_water_damage_review.htm

Mine is dead now but I tried running under the tap for a few seconds to see how bad the water proofing is. Yes, water runs right through the clasp. Before you ask, attaching the Lanyard does not improve things.

This has got to be the wrost design ever. If then don't fire a few people at Garmin over this it beggers belief.

[Ary]

Now I'm using sofware beta 2.51. The problem is Colorado 300 can't not make long route. I try to route follow road with long 300 km and colorado calculate error.

[David]

Colorado 300 dose not have :
- power off function,
- many commands are not in good place,
EX: NorthUp/TrackUP must be in Map view , not in setup
Tracks function must be accessible from Map view, not in setup,
Compass dose not work with satellite,
We can not cheek memory for track and route and waypoint,
Picture viewer too slow.
...

[upaboveclimber]

My Colorado 400t no longer works. It is not waterproof!

[Rich Owings]

upaboveclimber,

What happened? I've heard some reports that water can enter when you remove the battery cover.

[Chris]

Does anyone know if I can use the MapSource United States Topo Maps (V 3.02) that I got in a package deal with my eTrex on the Colorado 300. They are 1:100,000 scale just like the new Topo 2008 maps with the Colorado 400t.

[Rich Owings]

Chris,

Yes, they will work fine.

[Damjan]

Congratulations on the well written and informative article. Keep more of those coming!

[Dave]

Hi Folks - I have an eTrex Summit, and am now considering getting the Colorado. Can anyone tell me if it supports multiple Position Formats - lat/long, UTM etc?

[I use GPS in my work as an engineer and UTM is useful for me.]

[Rich Owings]

Yes, you should be able to display UTM on any Garmin handheld. There is an issue on the Colorado with entering UTM coordinates though. "When entering UTM coordinates (Edit Waypoint->Change Location) there is no space between the easting and northing making it hard to track where you are in the entry a very long string of numbers." (From http://garmincolorado.wikispaces.com/Issues+List#toc8)

BTW, I am recommending the Oregon over the Colorado, due to its superior interface and the lack of the tracking error often seen in the Colorado series...
http://gpstracklog.typepad.com/gps_tracklog/2008/05/garmin-colora-2.html

[Personal Loans]

It should be mentioned that the Colorado does not have support for custom waypoint symbols. Obviously many people are hoping it gets added as a feature in an upcoming release. I heard it may be out by early next year.

[John (Tanzania)]

i have changed from a Vista to the colorado 300 due to the larger screen, but so far very disapointed. My unit seems to have a faulty conection USBcable to unit, has to held back to maintain conection, and it will not down load tracks, but does down load waypoints.
Has anybdy had the same problems.

[Rich Owings]

John,

I haven't heard of that problem before. Do you have an extra mini-USB cable you can try, to eliminate the cable as a possibility?

[John (Tanzania}]

Hi Rich
I have a USB cable Ex Sony Camara, with the same mini plug, this does not work at all.
When trying to down load with the garmin cable, the power from the laptop also cuts in and out, but when used on power cable from a car lighter no problems saving tracks or way points, and the power supply remains constant.I intend to take the unit to a South African agent in Durban during December to see if they can test the unit and the cable to identify the problem.

[Rich Owings]

Yeah, sounds like one for Garmin support to figure out. Have you tried a different USB port on the laptop?

[James M. Shih]

In October, 2009 I posted " I live in Taiwan. I bought a Colorado 400T during June 2008. I used it for navigation during jetskiing (attached to the handle bar with it's handlebar mount) from the main island to nearby smaller island. During my first ride only 2 days after it was purchased, we ran into a Beaufort number 7-8 wind and one of a friend's jetski perished along with a father and his son. It was a headline news here. Luckily, I had the GPS and I must admit it saved my life. However, after I reached the island just 34 Km from the starting point, the GPS died on me. I later found out that night, water had gone into the battery compartment. I had it sent in for repair and Garmin was kind enough to replace a new one for me. After a very careful inspection, I found a flaw in its design. The O-ring (seal) that suppose to keep the water out would be squished upward whenever I tried sliding the case up. That's why so many of you are having trouble getting the cover completely slide up. If you take a very close look, after the O-ring was pushed up, there are detached parts of the O-ring (supposely glued to it's bottom) that separates and allow water to seep in. I believei it's a design flaw and the company should solve this problem. The only way I can make sure that won't happen again is to buy some camera O-ring grease and allow the case to slide more smoothly so the O-ring won't detach and get squished together. Unlike Garmin's previous water proof GPS, they were manufactured so that the back plate was placed over the seal and tightened by screws. In that way, there's no sliding force on a dry detachable O-ring seal. Lastly, after using the grease, it's hell trying to remove the greased sticky sliding case off for battery replacement. I'm going to wipe the grease off completely days before the warrantee rans out and take another trip on my jetski. I'm sure water will get in and I'll get this GPS replaced with a new one. Come to think of it, it really angers me that Garmin doesn't even make a sound addressing to this problem.

Dr. James M. Shih "

It's a new season for riding jetskis. I went to a nice GPS store where I purchased the Colorado and told them the defect still exist. I really would like for them to exchange the Oregon for me and gladly pay for the price difference. A Mr. Lu, technical director answer the phone and told me that the Colorado is waterproof to the IC board and is waterproof, period, even without the back cover. So I told him that I'll challenge him and put the unit without cover in a cup of water. He told me go ahead and said if it dies, he'll replace a new one for me. Well, it took 3 seconds to kill the unit. Now, I want to address the seal problem again. It's defective. Everytime the cover is slide up the unit, the seal would get drier from the grease they had put on and after a couple times, the seal would detached and water would get it. I told him I'll be riding off shore every weekend from now on. If he doesn't let me make an exchage for the Oregon, which had fixed the problem using a non-sliding cover, they will be replacing a unit just about every single week for me. Guess what Mr. Lu told me? He said if that's the only way to let his company know that this problem exist, I should go ahead and try. Well, I have to warn everybody, if anyone uses this unit expecting it's waterproof function. Don't buy it. I have less than 2 months of warrantee, and I expect they will be replacing at least 8 units before I ran out of warrantee and buy a different model. They have already replaced the unit 2 times for me due to this defect during my last days of riding last year. They'll be expecting to replace more. Oregon is a great leap of fix on this matter. It looks the same, but the cover is not sliding, it presses on to the seal and will not allow water into the unit.
This company's got many hard headed people that just won't acknowledge to a simple problem.